Tied Beer Prices vs Free of Tie: The Real Cost Breakdown
Last updated: 2 May 2026
Running this problem at your pub?
Here's the system I use at The Teal Farm to fix it — real-time labour %, cash position, and VAT liability in one dashboard. 30-minute setup. £97 once, no monthly fees.
Get Pub Command Centre — £97 →No monthly fees. 30-day money-back guarantee. Built by a working pub landlord.
Most tied pubs will tell you their beer prices are competitive. What they don’t tell you is that you’re locked into paying them whether the margins work or not. When I took on Teal Farm three years ago under a Marston’s CRP agreement, I discovered that comparing tied beer prices versus free-of-tie independence isn’t just about the pence per pint — it’s about control over your entire profit margin. This is the conversation the pubcos avoid, and the one you need to have before signing anything. You need to understand what tied beer prices actually cost you in real terms, including the hidden restrictions that come with the territory. This guide breaks down the financials honestly, with no sales pitch from either side. By the end, you’ll know exactly what you’re trading away when you accept a tie, and what independence will cost you.
Key Takeaways
- Tied pubs lock you into purchasing from the pubco at fixed prices, typically offering 15-25% lower wholesale costs than free-of-tie independents would pay.
- Free-of-tie pubs cost more per pint but give you complete control over suppliers, margins, and product range — critical if your local market demands it.
- Tied pub agreements often include invisible costs: restricted tie periods, compulsory product ranges, limited negotiation power, and penalties for switching suppliers.
- The best revenue year for a community pub depends more on operational efficiency and local demand than on whether you’re tied or free — labour cost control is the real lever.
What Is a Tied Pub Agreement?
A tied pub is one where the landlord is legally obliged to buy beer, cider, and often soft drinks from the pub company (pubco) that owns the building. This is the most common model in the UK. The pubco owns the freehold or leasehold of the property and leases it to you as the licensee. In return for that lease at below-market rent, you accept the tie — meaning you cannot buy your beer from anyone else.
The tie typically covers all draught products and most packaged lines. Some agreements are tighter than others. My Marston’s CRP agreement, for example, allows some flexibility on premium ciders and certain brands outside their core range, but the core six draught lines and most cask ales come directly from Marston’s at their set price.
The pubco argues this model benefits you: lower prices on volume, consistency across the estate, support from a larger business, and access to training and systems. All true. But let’s be clear about what you’re actually getting into.
How Tied Beer Pricing Works
Tied pubs receive beer at wholesale prices set by the pubco. These prices are substantially lower than what a free-of-tie pub would pay if buying from an independent wholesaler or brewery. A rough comparison: a tied pub might pay £15–£18 per case for a standard lager, while a free-of-tie pub buying from a cash-and-carry or wholesaler might pay £22–£28 per case, depending on volume and negotiating power.
The tied pub pricing advantage is typically 15-25% lower on mainstream products, which is real money on volume. If you’re doing 100 cases a week across draught and packaged lines, that difference alone could be £300–£500 per week.
However — and this is crucial — those prices are fixed. You don’t negotiate. If Marston’s increases the price of Carling by 8p per pint, you absorb it or pass it to customers. You have no alternative supplier to ring up and ask if their price is better. You’re locked in. And the tie is usually for the duration of your lease agreement, which can be 5, 10, or even 25 years depending on the deal.
The pubco also decides which products you stock and when. You cannot drop a slow-moving lager and replace it with a local craft ale unless the pubco approves it. That might sound trivial, but in a community pub where local preference matters — and it matters a lot — this lack of flexibility can cost you sales. I’ve had customers ask for specific ales because the pub down the road stocks them. I can’t always oblige.
Free-of-Tie Pubs: What You Actually Pay
Free-of-tie pubs are not tied to any supplier. You negotiate directly with breweries, wholesalers, and cash-and-carry operations. You can buy from whoever offers the best price, quality, and terms. In theory, this sounds brilliant. In practice, the costs are significantly higher, and the leverage is much smaller.
A free-of-tie pub buying independently typically pays 25-40% more per case than a tied pub. That £15–£18 case for a tied pub becomes £20–£25 for you. The reason is simple: you don’t have volume. Marston’s buys millions of cases across hundreds of pubs. You’re buying dozens. Wholesalers offer volume discounts. If you’re a one-pub operator, you don’t have volume.
Some free-of-tie operators join buying groups or co-operatives to try to get closer to wholesale pricing, but you’re still paying a premium. There’s also the time cost: you’re doing your own supplier negotiations, managing multiple invoices, handling deliveries and quality issues directly. A tied pub delegate these headaches to the pubco’s supply chain team.
Free-of-tie independence costs you 25-40% more on product cost, but gives you complete control over what you serve and to whom you sell it. That control has real value in the right location. If you’re in a market where customers care about local ales, craft beers, or specific brands, that control can justify the higher costs. If you’re in a commuter village where people want a pint of Stella and a packet of crisps, that control is wasted.
The Hidden Costs Beyond the Pint
The beer price difference is obvious. The hidden costs are where the real sting lives.
Compulsory Product Ranges
Tied agreements often require you to stock the entire range, even if it doesn’t sell. You might be obliged to carry five draught lagers, three ciders, and a craft offering whether your customers want them or not. Stock goes out of date. You lose money. Free-of-tie, you only order what sells.
Restricted Tie Periods and Penalties
Many pubcos impose a minimum tie period — typically 3-5 years. If you want to break free before that period ends, you face significant financial penalties. Some agreements allow you to pay a break fee; others require you to find another tenant to take over the agreement. This traps you even if the relationship isn’t working.
Limited Negotiation Power on Price Increases
When the pubco increases prices — and they will — you have no choice. Free-of-tie, you can shop around, negotiate, or switch suppliers. Tied, you either accept the increase or lose money on margin.
Support Costs That Aren’t Free
Pubcos offer support, training, and systems as a benefit of the tie. Useful, yes. But these costs are already built into the higher rent and tied margins you’re paying. You’re not getting free support; you’re paying for it indirectly.
When evaluating a pub profit margin calculator, make sure you factor in these invisible costs. Most financial models assume static costs per pint, but in reality, compulsory stock, price increases, and penalties erode your actual margin over time.
Which Model Makes Financial Sense?
The honest answer: it depends on four factors.
1. Your Local Market
In a village or suburban pub where customers drink mainstream brands, a tied pub is probably your best option. You’ll pay less per pint and can manage on standard stock. In an urban craft beer market or a tourist destination where product choice matters, free-of-tie gives you an edge.
2. Your Financial Position at Ingoing
A tied pub requires less capital to start. The ingoing costs are typically lower because the pubco handles inventory and supply chain risk. A free-of-tie pub requires more working capital to buy stock upfront, negotiate with multiple suppliers, and buffer for cash flow variations. If you’re on a tight budget, tied is more accessible.
3. Your Operational Confidence
Running a tied pub means you focus on service, food, events, and customer experience. The pubco handles supply logistics. Running a free-of-tie pub means you’re also managing supplier relationships, negotiating contracts, handling quality disputes, and tracking multiple invoices. If you’re new to the industry, that’s a lot to layer in.
4. The Deal Itself
Not all tied deals are equal. Some pubcos offer more flexibility, lower rent premiums, shorter tie periods, or better price structures. Not all free-of-tie deals are equally onerous. A freehold pub where you own the building is completely different from a leasehold free-of-tie where you’re paying market-rate rent to a landlord while also buying at free-of-tie prices. That’s the worst of both worlds.
The best financial model is the one where your costs align with your customer demand and your operational capacity. That might be tied, free-of-tie, or hybrid. The mistake is choosing based on ideology rather than numbers.
Real Numbers from a Working Licensee
Let me give you actual figures from Teal Farm, because theory is useful, but reality is what matters.
Teal Farm is a 180-cover community pub in Washington, Tyne & Wear. I took it on under a Marston’s CRP agreement three years ago. The pub runs a mix of wet sales (draught and packaged beer, spirits, soft drinks), dry sales (crisps, snacks, confectionery), and food service. We do quiz nights, sports events, and regular match days. In 2025, we had our best revenue year to date.
Our tied agreement with Marston’s means I buy all draught and most packaged lines from them at set prices. I’ve negotiated some flexibility on premium craft ales and specific customer requests outside the core range, but the main revenue drivers — Carling, Guinness, Coors, local cask ales from their range, and standard ciders — all come from Marston’s.
Our beer cost as a percentage of wet sales revenue runs approximately 28-32%, depending on the mix of draught versus premium packaged. That 28-32% is inclusive of all product cost, delivery, and tie-related margins to Marston’s. If I were free-of-tie and buying independently, I estimate that cost would rise to 38-45% on the same product mix, because I’d lose the volume discount and have higher logistics costs.
However, that apparent cost advantage is offset by a few realities: my rent is higher than it would be for a free-of-tie equivalent because the pubco is subsidising the lower beer prices with a rent premium. Marston’s doesn’t discount beer for free — they make margin on the tie. Second, I have zero flexibility on product, which means if a draught line doesn’t sell, I still pay for stock rotation and waste. Third, any price increase from Marston’s goes straight to my margin unless I pass it to customers, which isn’t always possible without losing competitiveness.
The payoff: I don’t have to manage five supplier relationships, negotiate contracts, or handle invoicing complexity. My supply chain is stable and reliable. My staff understand the systems. My costs are predictable quarter-to-quarter (price increases aside). And when I passed my Marston’s NSF audit in March 2026, the support and resources they provided during that process had genuine value.
Would I be better off as free-of-tie? Possibly, in a different market. In Washington, serving a mix of regulars, families, and sports watchers, the mainstream product range Marston’s provides matches demand. A free-of-tie craft beer focus would alienate half my customer base. The tie works here because it aligns with what my customers want to drink.
That’s the real decision-making framework: not “tied versus free-of-tie” in abstract, but “this specific tied agreement versus this specific free-of-tie opportunity, in this specific market, with my specific skills and capital.”
Labour Cost: The Real Lever
Here’s something nobody talks about enough: the difference between tied and free-of-tie pricing is real but marginal compared to labour cost control. At Teal Farm, our labour cost averages 15% of revenue. The UK benchmark for wet-led pubs is 25-30%. That 10-15 percentage point difference is worth far more than any tied versus free-of-tie price variance.
You could be free-of-tie with perfect product margins and still go bust if your staff costs run at 35% of revenue. You could be tied with a small beer cost disadvantage and still hit best revenue year if your team is efficient and motivated. Labour efficiency will move your bottom line more than any supplier negotiation.
Before you sign anything with a pubco, before you get excited about lower beer prices, make sure you understand your staffing model, your labour cost targets, and your rota management. That’s where the real money is made or lost. Tools like pub staff rota legal requirements matter because compliance costs money, but efficiency saves it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are tied pub beer prices always cheaper than free-of-tie?
Yes, tied pubs typically pay 15-25% less per case because the pubco has volume leverage. However, that discount is offset by higher rent and restricted product flexibility, so the actual net cost difference is smaller than the headline price suggests. A free-of-tie pub buying independently will pay 25-40% more per case but can choose their stock and suppliers.
Can I negotiate a tied beer agreement with a pubco?
Some flexibility is possible, particularly on premium brands, craft ales, and special events. Marston’s, for example, allows some negotiation within the CRP framework. However, the core tie — the legal obligation to buy draught mainstream lines from the pubco — is non-negotiable. You can ask for price caps, tie period reductions, or break fee structures, but the fundamental tie itself is the basis of the entire lease deal.
What happens if tied beer prices increase during my lease?
The pubco can increase prices within the agreement terms, and you must pay the new price or breach your lease. Some agreements include price cap clauses or consultation periods; others allow unlimited increases. Always ask this question before signing: what are the limits on annual price increases, and what happens if you cannot absorb them? This is critical to your financial model.
Is a free-of-tie pub worth the higher beer costs?
Only if your market demands it. If you’re in a location where customers want craft beer, local ales, or specific brands, the higher cost is justified and can be passed to customers as a premium product. If you’re in a mainstream market, the higher cost erodes your margins with no customer benefit. Always evaluate against local demand first.
What’s the real difference in profit between tied and free-of-tie?
The beer cost difference is typically 10-15 percentage points of wet sales revenue. However, labour costs, rent, and operational efficiency matter more. A tied pub with 15% labour costs and efficient operations will out-earn a free-of-tie pub with 35% labour costs. Focus on what you can control operationally before worrying about tied versus free-of-tie price differences.
You now understand the tied versus free-of-tie equation, but do you know whether your actual numbers will work in practice?
£97 once. No subscription. No monthly fees. Works on any device. 30-day money back guarantee.
For more information, visit retail partner earnings calculator.
For more information, visit best pub EPOS systems guide.
Running your pub on gut feel?
The Pub Command Centre gives you wet GP%, cellar checks, staff cost and weekly P&L — from your phone, every shift. £97 once. No subscription.
See the Pub Command Centre →